Skip to Content

Anton N. Handal

Partner
Overview

Anton N. Handal is the partner of Greenspoon Marder’s Intellectual Property and Litigation practice groups. With over 35 years of multijurisdictional litigation experience Mr. Handal has been first-chair in over 100 trials, litigated International Trade Commission Section 337 actions, represented clients before the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 17 Inter Partes Review proceedings and has been lead counsel in over 150 patent litigation matters.  He has achieved a $93,000,000 judgment for clients in a highly-charged shareholder derivative case between stakeholders of an African Telecom, was responsible for several successful PTAB outcomes, and has recovered millions of dollars for patent owner clients.

Mr. Handal advises business clients on a variety of business and intellectual property licensing transactions.  He has negotiated and documented business transactions of up to $130,000,000.  As former CEO of a start-up technology company, he has secured patents, directed financial transactions, negotiated contracts, raised capital and handled communications with shareholder/investors.

Mr. Handal has an active off-shore practice that includes advising and representing international companies on a variety of issues that range from doing business in the U.S. to defending off-shore clients in U.S. Court.  He serves the needs of Asia Pacific companies and individuals and has represented several Asian publicly traded companies.  He has an extensive network of affiliates throughout Asia to further the needs of his Domestic US clients that seek to do business overseas.

Mr. Handal has been a featured speaker at various webinars and conferences various topics: “Modern Trends in IP Litigation,” “From Decision to Practice” and “Building a Right Platform: Key Legal Issues of the U.S. Beauty Industry.”   He is a certified CLE lecturer in California and Florida on patent litigation topics; is a regular author a contributor on patent litigation topics; and responsible for several precedent setting court decisions in California and at the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit.

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court, Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
  • U.S. Court of Appeal, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Supreme Court

Bar Admissions

  • California
  • Florida

Education

  • J.D., Southwestern University School of Law, 1982
  • B.A., University of California at Los Angeles, Economics, 1980
Experience

Notable Experience

  • Represented Plaintiff minority shareholders in shareholder derivative litigation alleging breach of fiduciary duty and violations of the Corporations Code relating to an international telecommunications business leading to a Judgment for Plaintiffs of more than $93,000,000, based on the value of misappropriated corporate property
  • Represented Plaintiffs/Respondents on appeal of six-figure sanction award for discovery misuse following Appellants/Defendants’ disobedience of discovery order, resulting in successful affirmance of the award in a published opinion by the Fourth Appellate District
  • Represented Respondent electronics manufacturing company in U.S. Customs and Border Protection Seizure cases concerning trademark validity. Filed successful Petition for Relief from Forfeiture resulting in dismissal of all cases and return of client property
  • Represented a world leading German manufacturer in re: Certain Automated Media Library Devices, U.S. International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-746.  Mr. Handal represented five respondents in a Section 337 investigation involving automated data storage devices. Resulting in a complete victory after trial and appeal for the firm’s client.

Representative Case Work

  • Certain DVD Players and Recorders and Certain Products Containing Same, U.S. International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-603, obtained favorable settlement for multiple respondents in Section 337 Investigation involving patented DVD player and DVD recorder technology
  • Digital Corporation v. Apple, Inc., et al., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, representing plaintiff patent holder in more than 20 patent infringement lawsuits against smartphone, tablet, and camera manufacturers and retailers in effort  to  enforce client’s flash memory-related patents
  • Patent Harbor, LLC v. Audiovox Corporation, et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:10-cv-361-LED-JDL, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Docket No. 13- 1341, representing defendant and appellee in patent infringement litigation involving technology for generating and displaying DVD content menus
  • Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Acer America Corporation, et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:10-cv-597-LED, representing three defendants in patent infringement litigation related to parental control technology for DVD players and TVs
  • Patent Harbor, LLC v. Audiovox Corporation, et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:10-cv-361-LED-JDL, representing defendant in patent infringement litigation involving technology for generating and displaying DVD content menus.
  • Collins, et al. v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc., et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:09-cv-219-DF, obtained favorable settlement for defendant in patent infringement litigation involving diamond like carbon coating for computer hard disc drives
  • Multimedia Patent Trust v. Directv, Inc., et al. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:09-cv-278-JAH-CAB, obtained favorable settlement for defendant in patent infringement litigation involving MPEG-2 encoding and decoding technologies
  • Maldonado v. Belt Drives, Ltd., United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:08-cv-1431, obtained favorable settlement for plaintiff in patent infringement litigation related to a patented motorcycle brake design
  • Those Characters From Cleveland, Inc. v. The Singing Machine Company, Inc. State of Ohio, Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Case No. CV09-692823, obtained favorable settlement for Defendant in dispute over copyright/trademark license agreement
  • CN Capital, Inc. v. CalAmp Corp., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Ventura, Case No. CIV243567, obtained favorable settlement for defendants and cross-complainants arising from dispute over an asset purchase agreement
  • Orient Power Hi-Fi Manufacturing Limited v. Peavey Electronics Corporation, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2007-66460, obtained favorable settlement for Hong Kong manufacturer/supplier plaintiff in dispute over approximately $1 million in unpaid invoices
  • Surround the Sound Media Corp. v. International Disc Manufacturer, et al., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. SC94612, obtained favorable settlement for defendant and cross-complainant DVD disc manufacturer in contract dispute
  • Delta Millennium, Inc. v. Starlight Marketing (Hk) Ltd., United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Case 3:12-cv-02824, obtained favorable settlement for international manufacturing defendant in breach of contract case
  • Tan vs. Dolby, et al., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No.05-cv- 3973, successful representation of a key female executive of a multinational firm in connection with claims of wrongful termination. This cornerstone case dealt with the rights of non-US resident women under the United States laws and Constitution to be free from workplace harassment
  • Anand vs. Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-09-484513, represented defendants in consumer class action involving CD Players; obtained dismissal of class allegations and resolved matter in favor of manufacturing defendants
  • Koch vs. Gateway., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 05-cv- 2229 obtained favorable settlement in national class action case involving defects with plasma televisions
  • Jaffe vs. Pioneer North America Inc., Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. GIC835574, obtained favorable settlement in national class action case involving defects with plasma televisions. vs. WellPoint, ADRS Case No. 06-5776-JWO, successfully arbitrated wrongful termination case and obtained favorable settlement in favor of a top level, key female executive
  • Fuess vs. San Diego Regional Center for the Developmentally Disabled, et al., Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. GIC 843862, obtained favorable settlement for plaintiff employee in wrongful termination and discrimination dispute
  • AMCOBeauty Corporation v. Armstrong McCall, L.P. et  al.,  Superior  Court  of California,  County  of  San  Diego,  Case  No.   37-2008-00091713-CU-BC-CTL, litigated and obtained favorable settlement of complex franchise-franchisor dispute
  • McProud Inc. v. Armstrong McCall, L.P. et al., U.S. District Court of California, Case Number 8:11-CV-01504-JST, litigated and obtained favorable settlement of complex franchise-franchisor dispute
  • Koornenny vs. Landfill Holdings LLC, Superior Court of California County of Ventura, Case No. SC 038916 and Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No.: GIC 862459, represented defendants in dispute with former counsel over attorneys’ fees; successfully won change of venue motion and appeal on that motion; obtained favorable settlement for clients
  • Mahe vs. Gordon, et al., Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. GIC874406, obtained favorable settlement for minor injured in golf cart accident against golf cart owner and makers of E-Z-GO golf cart
  • Palmer v. Scull, et al., Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2008- 00098697-CU-BC-CTL, represented individual plaintiff in complex real estate dispute/real estate investment case; obtained over $13,000,000 judgment against corporate defendants and over $6 million in judgments against corporate officers of those entities
  • Adams vs. W.C. Richards, County of Orange Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 04CC07238, obtained favorable settlement for landfill worker against paint manufacturer for personal injuries related to the disposal of paint products
  • Glover vs. Planned Parenthood, et al. Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2007-00071484-CU-PN-CTL, obtained favorable settlement in medical malpractice claim against Planned Parenthood for personal injuries related to alleged late diagnosis of cervical cancer
  • Clinton vs. Gentle Dental & Orthodontics, et al., Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, Case No. INC 1206329, represented major dental insurance company in dental malpractice case; successfully resolved matter during initial stages of litigation

Professional and Community Involvement

  • Villa View Hospital Board of Directors, Member
  • San Diego Railroad Museum, Board of Trustees, Member
  • San Diego Fire Youth Soccer Team, Counsel
  • New International Cottages, Inc., Pro-Bono Counsel

Speaking Engagement

Publications

In the News

News & Videos