Roy Taub

Partner

Roy Taub is a partner in the Litigation practice group at Greenspoon Marder LLP. Mr. Taub practices commercial litigation, with experience in class actions, antitrust, real estate, sports and entertainment law, and intellectual property litigation. He has represented a diverse mix of clients in all stages of litigation, beginning with motion practice and through discovery, trial, and appeal, in state and federal courts and arbitration proceedings.

Mr. Taub has represented the largest health care company and several of its affiliates in numerous disputes, a telecommunications company in a lawsuit filed to identify and then prosecute claims against the parties responsible for disrupting a high-profile online event, multiple timeshare companies in various matters (including obtaining dismissal of a novel antitrust claim with prejudice), a leading international waste management company in an antitrust class action alleging attempted monopolization of the Long Island commercial waste hauling market, and represented the National Football League (NFL) Players Association and NFL Players Inc., in a class action over the commercial licensing of retired professional football players’ intellectual property.

Additionally, he has represented one of the world’s leading producers of titanium chemicals, an issuer of student loan-backed auction rate notes, a foreign state in a lawsuit over an unconsummated real estate transaction, a number of real estate developers and investment firms, life sciences companies, and one of the country’s largest supermarket chains.

Prior to joining Greenspoon Marder, Mr. Taub practiced in New York with two international law firms.

Experience

Representative Experience

Brian J. Lyngaas, D.D.S., P.L.L.C. v. Solstice Benefits, Inc., No. 22-CV-10830, 2025 WL 2689015 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 19, 2025) (denying plaintiff’s motion for class certification)
Thales Avionics, Inc. v. Matsushita Avionics Sys. Corp., No. SACV 04-454 JVS(MLGX), 2006 WL 8569652 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2006) (granting summary judgment in favor of clients on antitrust claims)
All Star Carts and Vehicles, Inc. v. BFI Canada Income Fund, 887 F. Supp. 2d 448 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (granting summary judgment in favor of client on antitrust claims)
One William Street Capital Management, LP. v. Educ. Loan Trust IV, No. 652274/2012, 2015 WL 4501194 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. July 18, 2015) (granting motion for summary judgment in favor of client in dispute regarding auction rate notes)
Calmes v. Boca W. Country Club, Inc., No. 9:17-CV-80574, 2017 WL 4621112 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 16, 2017) (dismissing plaintiff’s RICO and other claims)
Visser v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-1029, 2020 WL 415845 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2020) (denying plaintiff’s motion for class certification)
Bell v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc., No. 19-CIV-60752-RAR, 2020 WL 5639947 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 21, 2020) (granting client’s motion to compel arbitration)
Hirsch v. USHealth Advisors, LLC, 337 F.R.D. 118 (N.D. Tex. 2020) (denying plaintiff’s motion for class certification)
Winters v. Grand Caribbean Cruises Inc., No. CV-20-00168-PHX-DWL, 2021 WL 511217 (D. Ariz. Feb. 11, 2021) (dismissing TCPA claims against client)
McCulllough v. Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Dev., LLC, No. 6:22-CV-03029-MDH, 2022 WL 1599702 (W.D. Mo. May 19, 2022) (denying plaintiff’s motion to remand, agreeing that diversity jurisdiction-defeating defendant was fraudulently joined)
Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Fin. Educ. Servs., Inc., No. 2:22-CV-11120-BAF-APP, 2022 WL 19333295 (E.D. Mich. July 18, 2022) (denying FTC’s motion for preliminary injunction, vacating temporary restraining order, terminating asset freeze, and converting receivership to monitorship)
Klassen v. Advanced Mktg. & Processing, Inc., No. 8:21-CV-761-MSS-MRM, 2023 WL 11910565 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2023) (granting summary judgment in favor of client on TCPA claim)
Taveras v. Bank of Am., N.A., 89 F.4th 1279 (11th Cir. 2024) (affirming order staying case under Colorado River doctrine until conclusion of pending state foreclosure action)
Wesley Fin. Grp., LLC v. Westgate Resorts, Ltd., 746 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (M.D. Fla. 2024) (dismissing with prejudice antitrust, Lanham Act, FDUTPA, tortious interference, and other claims against client)
Pop v. LuliFama.com LLC, No. 24-11048, 2025 WL 2177719 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025) (affirming dismissal of FDUTPA and other claims, holding as a matter of first impression that Rule 9(b) applies to FDUTPA claims sounding in fraud)

Awards

Recognitions

Benchmark Litigation, Florida “Future Star,” 2024-2025
Super Lawyers magazine, “Florida Rising Star,” General Litigation, 2017-2019
Super Lawyers magazine, “New York Metro Rising Star,” General Litigation, 2014-2015