Sherine Marder, Esq.
Jackson Memorial Hospital recently encountered the
case of a patient who was brought into the emergency department unconscious, with a deteriorating medical condition, and without identification or family. Tattooed on the patient’s chest were the words, “Do Not Resuscitate,” followed by what appeared to be the patient’s signature. Understandably, this created an ethical dilemma for the University of Miami doctors treating the patient.
Fla. Stat. § 401.45(3)(a) provides that resuscitation of a patient may be withheld or withdrawn if a valid order not to resuscitate in the form approved of by Florida’s Department of Health is signed by the patient’s physician and the patient or, if the patient is incapacitated, one who is authorized to make health care decisions on behalf of the patient, such as a health care surrogate or proxy, court-appointed guardian, or attorney in fact under durable power of attorney. This form –
DH Form 1896 – must be printed on yellow paper, and it has the words “DO NOT RESUSCITATE ORDER” printed in black and displayed across the top of the form.
In the unique case presented at Jackson Memorial Hospital, although the doctors initially questioned whether the tattoo was a true indication of the patient’s wishes and sought not to honor the tattoo absent a valid order not to resuscitate, after an ethics consultation, they decided that it was reasonable to infer that the tattoo indicated a genuine preference and an order not to resuscitate was prepared for the patient. The social work department eventually did locate the patient’s valid DH Form 1896 confirming the patient’s wishes, and the patient died without undergoing life-sustaining measures. Nonetheless, the case highlights the importance of planning for the future, particularly as it relates to one’s health care preferences, in order to avoid any confusion and ensure that the decisions are yours.
*The information in this article is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Greenspoon Marder, P.A., In New York, Greenspoon Marder, P.A. practices under the name Greenspoon Marder, P.A. P.C. In California, Greenspoon Marder LLP practices using the fictitious name and trademark Greenspoon Marder under license from Greenspoon Marder, P.A., or the individual author(s), nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
About Greenspoon Marder
Greenspoon Marder LLP is committed to providing excellent client service through our cross-disciplinary, client-team approach. Our goal is to understand the challenges that our clients face, build collaborative relationships, and craft creative solutions designed and executed with long-term strategic goals in mind. Since our inception in 1981, Greenspoon Marder LLP has become a full-service, Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 ranked law firm with more than 200 attorneys. We serve Fortune 500, middle-market public and private companies, start-ups, emerging businesses, individuals and entrepreneurs across the United States. For more information, visit www.gmlaw.com.
Michelle Martinez Reyes, Chief Marketing Officer
954.333.4357 | email@example.com